Can You Name Five Game of Thrones Leaders? Rank!

Okay, picture this: Westeros’s political landscape, influenced by figures like Cersei Lannister, is complex. HBO’s Game of Thrones presented us with a ton of memorable characters. But can you name five game of thrones leaders and actually rank them based on their… well, let’s just say effectiveness? Think of it as a fun exercise to see if you remember all the strategic plays and power grabs from the Seven Kingdoms! And hey, maybe we can even use a tool like a tier list maker to visually represent our ranking.

Ranking the Leaders of Westeros: A Game of Thrones Leadership Analysis

Hey Game of Thrones fans! Ever wonder who really ruled Westeros, and who just played the game? We all have our favorites, but let’s face it: not every character with a crown was a true leader.

This isn’t just about who sat on the Iron Throne. It’s about analyzing leadership—who inspired loyalty, made the tough calls, and actually led people, armies, or even entire kingdoms.

Beyond the Throne: Defining True Leadership

We’re diving deep into the minds and actions of some of Westeros’ most prominent figures, from the would-be queens to the unlikely heroes.

Think of it as a critical re-evaluation of their tenures. A chance to reconsider all our favorite characters.

A Kaleidoscope of Styles

Westeros saw it all: the fire-and-blood approach, the stoic and honorable path, and the cunning schemes hatched in the shadows. Each leader brought a unique style to the table.

Some led through fear, some through respect, and others… well, let’s just say their methods were questionable. This article hopes to critically evaluate each approach.

The Measuring Stick: How We Judge

How do you measure a leader in a world as brutal as Westeros? Not easily. But we’ll try! We’ll be looking at a few key factors:

• Strategic brilliance: Did they outwit their enemies?
• Impact: Did their actions leave a lasting mark on the realm?
• Morality: Did they try to do what was right (even when it was hard)?
• Diplomacy: Could they negotiate peace or forge alliances?

A Subjective (But Informed!) Take

Full disclosure: this isn’t a scientific study. It’s an opinion, albeit one based on close rewatching, careful consideration, and maybe just a touch of obsession with all things Game of Thrones.

We’re going to rank them according to a very specific set of criteria, for better or worse. Prepare to disagree (and let us know why in the comments!). The true value of this blog post is debate and the discovery of nuance.

Defining Leadership in Westeros: Criteria for a Great Leader

Hey Game of Thrones fans! Ever wonder who really ruled Westeros, and who just played the game? We all have our favorites, but let’s face it: not every character with a crown was a true leader.

This isn’t just about who sat on the Iron Throne. It’s about analyzing leadership—who actually knew how to lead, inspire, and maybe even not get everyone killed in the process! Before we dive into ranking the contenders, we need to establish what makes a great leader in the brutal world of Westeros.

The Westerosi Leadership Bar: Not Your Average Job Description

Westeros isn’t exactly known for its HR department, is it? Forget employee reviews and team-building exercises. In Westeros, leadership is a matter of survival, power, and legacy. So, what qualities set the good apart from the… well, let’s just say less successful rulers?

Strategic Brilliance: More Than Just Winning Battles

Of course, tactical skill is crucial. A leader who can’t win battles probably won’t be a leader for long.

But strategic brilliance goes beyond the battlefield. It’s about anticipating threats, understanding the long game, and making calculated decisions that benefit the realm (or at least, the leader’s own ambitions).

Think about it: a good commander doesn’t just know how to fight. They know when to fight, where to fight, and who to fight with.

The Art of the Deal: Diplomacy and Negotiation

Okay, swords and dragons are cool, but sometimes, talking is better. Diplomacy and negotiation are essential leadership skills in Westeros.

Can a leader forge alliances? Can they navigate complex political landscapes without sparking a war? The ability to negotiate treaties, broker peace, and even just convince people to do what you want is worth its weight in gold (or dragon eggs).

Impact on the Realm: Beyond the Iron Throne

A great leader doesn’t just sit on the Iron Throne. They do something with it. What lasting impact does a leader have on the realm and its people?

Do they bring prosperity? Do they protect the vulnerable? Do they leave Westeros better than they found it? (Spoiler alert: it’s a low bar).

Morality in Westeros: A Gray Area

Let’s be real, morality in Westeros is…complicated. Purely "good" leaders are rare.

We’re not necessarily looking for saints here. Instead, we’re considering the ethical implications of their choices within the context of their world.

Did they prioritize the well-being of their people (even if it meant making tough calls)? Were they driven by justice or solely by personal gain? It’s a very gray area, but an important one.

Legitimacy: Does Westeros Buy It?

Perception is everything. Legitimacy is huge in Westeros. It doesn’t matter if you are the rightful heir if nobody believes you are.

This includes everything from birthright to religious endorsements, to the general consensus of the Lords and Ladies of Westeros. A leader without legitimacy will face constant challenges to their rule, weakening their ability to lead.

Applying the Criteria: It’s Judgment Time!

So, how will we use these criteria to judge our Westerosi leaders? Simple. We’ll look at each leader individually, analyzing their actions, decisions, and impact based on these factors.

It’s going to be messy, subjective, and hopefully spark a few debates. Get ready to agree, disagree, and maybe even be a little bit outraged by our rankings. It’s all part of the fun! Let the analysis begin!

Top-Tier Leaders: The Power Players of Westeros

Okay, time to get serious. We’ve set the stage, laid out the ground rules, and now it’s time to dive into the big leagues. These are the leaders who consistently displayed traits that made them forces to be reckoned with in the chaotic world of Westeros. We’re not saying they were perfect, but they undeniably left their mark!

Let’s break down what made them stand out.

Daenerys Targaryen: The Dragon Queen’s Dual Nature

Daenerys…where do we even begin? Her leadership is one of the most debated aspects of the entire series. Was she a liberator or a conqueror? Honestly, it’s probably a bit of both, right?

She started as a young girl sold into marriage and rose to become a powerful queen with dragons and an army at her command.

Her impact on Meereen was…complex. She freed the slaves but struggled to maintain order and faced constant rebellion. It’s a tough gig, ruling!

And then there’s Westeros. Her arrival shook the established power structure to its core. But her methods… let’s just say they weren’t always the most popular, or ethically sound.

Ultimately, Daenerys’ ranking comes down to her potential and her vision, tragically cut short by her own flaws and the machinations of those around her. She had the power to change the world, but did she have the wisdom?

Jon Snow: Honor and Duty in a Treacherous World

Ah, Jon Snow. You know nothing…except how to lead, apparently! Jon’s leadership style is all about honor, duty, and doing what he believes is right, even when it’s painfully difficult.

His struggle with legitimacy plagued him throughout the series. Born a bastard, he never sought power but was thrust into leadership roles time and again because people recognized his inherent goodness and his commitment to them.

His impact on the North was undeniable. He united the Wildlings and the Northern houses against the White Walkers, saving Westeros from complete annihilation.

His selflessness is what makes Jon truly stand out. He may not have wanted to be a leader, but he stepped up when needed, proving that true leadership isn’t about ambition, but about service.

Cersei Lannister: Power at Any Cost

Okay, let’s talk about Cersei. Love her or hate her (and most people probably lean towards the latter), you can’t deny her ruthless effectiveness. Her leadership style is simple: power at any cost.

Political intrigue was her bread and butter. She played the game of thrones with a cunning and ferocity that few could match.

Her impact on King’s Landing was… well, destructive. She blew up the Sept of Baelor, murdered countless rivals, and ultimately brought ruin upon the city.

Cersei’s ranking is a testament to the fact that leadership isn’t always about being "good." She was a brilliant manipulator and a survivor, even if her methods were often monstrous.

Tyrion Lannister: Intellect and Diplomacy in Action

The Imp! Tyrion’s leadership is all about intellect and diplomacy. He might not be a warrior, but his strategic mind and his silver tongue make him one of the most valuable players in the game.

His strategic contributions were numerous. He defended King’s Landing during the Battle of Blackwater Bay and served as Hand to both Daenerys and Jon, offering invaluable counsel.

His moral flexibility is both a strength and a weakness. He’s willing to compromise and make difficult choices, but sometimes those choices come at a cost.

Tyrion’s ranking is based on his ability to see the bigger picture and to use his intellect to solve problems, even when those problems seem insurmountable. Plus, he’s just so damn witty!

Robb Stark: The Young Wolf’s Rise and Fall

Robb Stark, the Young Wolf. A leader who rose to power out of duty and love for his family. Robb embodies honor, duty, and family above all else.

His military strategy was impressive. He won battle after battle against the Lannister forces, proving himself to be a brilliant commander despite his youth.

His failures, however, were devastating. His decision to break his marriage pact with the Frey family ultimately led to the Red Wedding and the downfall of the Stark rebellion.

Robb’s ranking is a bittersweet one. He had the potential to be a great leader, but his youth and his adherence to honor ultimately proved to be his undoing. A true tragedy.

These are just a few of the top-tier leaders in Westeros. Leaders who shaped the world of Game of Thrones in profound and lasting ways. But the story doesn’t stop here. There are more players in the game, leaders with potential, with flaws, and with stories worth exploring. Stay tuned.

The Near-Greats: Solid Leaders with Notable Flaws

Okay, time to get serious. We’ve set the stage, laid out the ground rules, and now it’s time to dive into the big leagues. These are the leaders who consistently displayed traits that made them forces to be reckoned with in the chaotic world of Westeros. We’re not saying they were perfect, but they undeniably left their mark.

But, what about those individuals who almost made it to the top? The ones who showed incredible potential but were ultimately held back by their own flaws or circumstances? This section is dedicated to those "near-greats" – leaders with impressive qualities, but significant shortcomings that prevented them from reaching true legendary status.

Let’s explore what kept these leaders from achieving ultimate power and lasting impact.

Stannis Baratheon: The Rightful Heir with a Fatal Flaw

Stannis Baratheon: a name that evokes both respect and, let’s be honest, a bit of a groan. He was the rightful heir (according to his own unwavering conviction, anyway). He was militarily disciplined and incorruptible. So, what went wrong?

It all boils down to a single, devastating flaw: Stannis was utterly incapable of inspiring genuine loyalty.

The Iron Grip of Legitimacy

Stannis’s leadership style was as rigid as his sense of duty. He believed so fiercely in the law, in the correct order of things, that he couldn’t connect with people on an emotional level.

He saw himself as a tool of justice, not a leader of men. That’s why he was so easily manipulated by Melisandre.

He was so focused on what he deserved that he forgot to earn the love and respect of his people.

Overshadowed by the Red Woman

And let’s not forget Melisandre, the Red Woman, whose influence on Stannis proved catastrophic. Stannis’s dependence on her magic alienated him from his most loyal supporters, like Davos Seaworth.

Davos was a man of unwavering loyalty and a true moral compass. Ignoring Davos was probably Stannis’ biggest strategic blunder.

Ultimately, Stannis’s unwavering belief in his own righteousness, combined with Melisandre’s manipulative influence, led to his downfall. A tragic case of potential squandered.

Tywin Lannister: The Master Strategist with a Blind Spot

Tywin Lannister. Just the name sends shivers down your spine. The man was a strategic genius, a master of political maneuvering, and a ruthless pragmatist. He rebuilt House Lannister’s reputation after his father’s weakness nearly ruined it. He instilled in his children (well, at least Cersei and Jaime) a deep understanding of power.

But here’s the thing: Tywin’s brilliance was inextricably linked to his complete lack of morality.

Power at Any Cost

Tywin saw people as pieces on a chessboard, disposable assets in his grand scheme.

He didn’t care about the human cost of his actions. The Red Wedding? Horrific, but undeniably effective in crushing the Stark rebellion.

His cold, calculating approach to leadership made him feared, not loved.

And while fear can be a powerful tool, it’s a shaky foundation upon which to build a dynasty.

Family Dysfunction

Tywin’s biggest failing, ironically, was his own family. His inability to understand and nurture his children (particularly Tyrion) led to his demise.

He was so blinded by his own ambitions and prejudices that he failed to see the potential within Tyrion, a mistake that ultimately cost him his life. In trying to control everything, he lost control of his own family, and that was his undoing.

Sansa Stark: The Queen in the North, Still Learning the Game

Sansa Stark’s journey is one of the most compelling in the entire series. She starts as a naive, romantic girl and transforms into a shrewd political player. As Queen in the North, she demonstrated a clear understanding of leadership, prioritizing the well-being of her people and forging alliances that secured the North’s independence.

But, let’s be honest, Sansa is still relatively inexperienced.

From Victim to Strategist

Sansa’s strength lies in her ability to learn from her experiences, no matter how traumatic.

She endured unimaginable horrors, but she emerged stronger, wiser, and more determined than ever.

She learned from the best (and worst) players in the game, including Cersei Lannister and Petyr Baelish.

Limitations and the Path Ahead

Despite her growth, Sansa’s leadership still has limitations. She can be distrustful and wary of outsiders, and her focus remains largely on the North. That’s not necessarily a bad thing, but it could hinder her ability to see the bigger picture.

Sansa is a leader on the rise, but she still needs time to fully mature into the role. She possesses the intelligence, the determination, and the empathy to become a truly great ruler. But for now, she remains a "near-great," a leader with immense potential still waiting to be fully realized.

The Wildcards: Leaders with Untapped Potential or Fatal Flaws

Okay, time to venture into uncharted territory. We’ve explored the top-tier strategists and the near-greats, and now we need to discuss individuals whose leadership is… well, complicated.

These are the figures whose impact on Westeros is harder to pin down, thanks to inconsistent actions, dubious motives, or simply a lack of opportunity. Prepare for some controversial takes!

Euron Greyjoy: The Rock Star Pirate with a God Complex

Ah, Euron. What are we supposed to make of this guy?

He strides onto the scene with the swagger of a rock star pirate, oozing charisma and promising world domination (or at least control of Westeros).

Euron’s leadership style is, to put it mildly, unconventional. Brutal tactics? Check. Blatant disregard for morality? Double-check. A fleet of ships built with suspiciously supernatural speed? You betcha!

But beneath the bravado and the eyeliner lies a leader whose ambition might just outstrip his ability. He knows how to inspire (or terrify) his followers, but does he have a vision beyond personal glory?

Is Euron a Genius or Just Lucky?

That’s the million-dragon question, isn’t it?

Euron’s success often feels less like strategic brilliance and more like sheer, dumb luck. He manages to capture key players, score major victories, and generally wreak havoc, but is this due to careful planning, or is he simply riding a wave of chaos?

And let’s be honest, his constant monologuing about becoming a god gets a little tiresome. Effective leaders inspire loyalty, but Euron seems to inspire a mixture of fear and morbid fascination.

Ultimately, Euron’s ranking is tough because his impact is undeniable, but his long-term vision (if he even has one) remains shrouded in mystery. His leadership is a volatile mix of ambition, brutality, and a whole lot of crazy, making him one of Westeros’s most unpredictable figures.

Mance Rayder: The King Who Knelt for No One (Except to Help His People)

Now, let’s shift gears entirely.

Mance Rayder presents a fascinating contrast to Euron’s ambition-fueled rampage. He’s a leader who sacrificed personal glory for the well-being of his people.

A former brother of the Night’s Watch, Mance united the disparate tribes of Wildlings – a feat previously thought impossible. That alone is a testament to his charisma and strategic thinking.

The Pragmatic Idealist

What sets Mance apart is his pragmatism. He understood that the Wildlings couldn’t defeat the Night’s Watch in a straight-up fight.

So, he sought to bypass them, leading his people south to escape the encroaching White Walkers. This required immense courage, tactical brilliance, and the ability to convince thousands of fiercely independent people to follow him.

However, Mance’s impact on the broader political landscape of Westeros was ultimately limited.

His focus was always on the survival of his people, and his resources were severely constrained. He lacked the political savvy and military might to truly challenge the established power structures.

Despite this, Mance Rayder deserves recognition for his unwavering dedication to his people and his refusal to compromise his principles. He may not have conquered kingdoms, but he saved countless lives, and that makes him a leader worthy of respect.

In conclusion, both Euron and Mance occupy a unique space in the leadership landscape of Game of Thrones. They are forces to be reckoned with, yet both have a lot to improve on. Whether through selfishness or the greater good, they were both unique leaders.

Supporting Characters & Factors: The Unsung Heroes (and Villains) Shaping Westeros’ Leaders

Okay, so we’ve dissected the big players, the ones sitting on the Iron Throne (or trying to).

But let’s be real – no leader operates in a vacuum.

Westeros is a tangled web of relationships, rivalries, and hidden agendas.

To truly understand leadership in this world, we need to acknowledge the supporting cast and the powerful factions that pull the strings.

It’s time to shine a spotlight on those who exert influence from the shadows, from the battlefield, and from the very foundations of society.

The Silent Blade: Arya Stark’s Impact

Arya Stark is more than just a fan favorite; she’s a force of nature.

Her journey from a spirited tomboy to a highly skilled assassin makes her a critical player in the Game of Thrones.

Think about it: she eliminates key threats – the Night King, Walder Frey.

These actions drastically alter the course of events, impacting the strategies and even the survival of other leaders.

Her direct actions shape the future of Westeros.

She’s a one-person wrecking crew against the Long Night.

Arya is directly responsible for the survival of the realm.

Littlefinger: Master of Chaos

Petyr Baelish, aka Littlefinger, thrived in the shadows.

He wasn’t a king or a general, but he was arguably one of the most influential figures in Westeros.

His talent was chaos.

He planted seeds of doubt and discord, manipulating events to his advantage.

Littlefinger’s actions directly destabilized the realm, creating opportunities for certain leaders (and hindering others).

He manipulated Ned Stark which created a chain of events that created an ultimate war.

He was a puppet master whose strings extended far and wide.

The Houses That Built Westeros

The great houses of Westeros aren’t just fancy names and sigils.

They represent vast networks of power, wealth, and influence that shape the political landscape.

Here is a little bit more about each:

House Lannister: Gold and Grip

The Lannisters’ immense wealth granted them unparalleled influence.

They could finance armies, bribe officials, and control the flow of resources.

This power allowed them to prop up their own leaders (like Cersei) and exert control over the Iron Throne.

Money can buy anything, especially in Westeros.

House Stark: Honor and Resilience

The Starks embodied a different kind of power: honor, duty, and resilience.

Their unwavering commitment to justice and their deep connection to the North inspired loyalty and respect.

Even when facing overwhelming odds, the Starks refused to compromise their values.

House Targaryen: Fire and Legacy

The Targaryens, with their dragons and their legacy of conquest, represented a volatile force.

Their return to Westeros, led by Daenerys, disrupted the existing power balance.

This forced other leaders to adapt or face annihilation.

Daenerys’ presence alone reshaped the political landscape.

Each of these houses, with their unique strengths and weaknesses, played a vital role in shaping the leadership landscape of Westeros.

Visual Aids: Level Up Your "Game of Thrones" Leadership Analysis

Okay, so we’ve dissected the big players, the ones sitting on the Iron Throne (or trying to). But let’s be real – no leader operates in a vacuum. Westeros is a tangled web of relationships, rivalries, and hidden agendas. To truly understand leadership in this world, we need more than just words. We need visuals!

Think about it: wouldn’t it be way easier to compare Daenerys’s diplomatic skills to Cersei’s if you could see it side-by-side? That’s where visual aids come in. They’re not just pretty pictures; they’re powerful tools for analysis.

The Power of a Good Visual

Why bother with charts and graphs when we can just argue about who’s the best in the comments? Well, because visuals offer clarity and a new perspective.

They can help you quickly grasp complex information, spot trends, and make informed judgments.

Plus, they can make your arguments way more persuasive.

Who can argue with cold, hard data presented in a visually appealing way?

Comparison Matrices: The Ultimate Showdown

Imagine a table where the rows are Westeros leaders and the columns are the key leadership criteria: strategic brilliance, diplomacy, impact on the realm, morality, and legitimacy.

Each cell would contain a rating (maybe out of 5 stars?) or a brief description of how that leader performs in that specific area.

Boom! Instant comparison.

You could quickly see, for example, that Tyrion is a master diplomat but maybe lacks the strategic vision of Tywin.

Or that Jon Snow is highly moral but struggles with the political games.

This type of matrix is awesome because it forces you to be specific and consider each leader from multiple angles.

Rating Scales: Quantifying the "Qualified"

Another option? Rating scales!

Instead of a table, imagine a series of bar graphs, each representing a different leader.

The height of each bar would correspond to their score on a particular leadership criterion.

For instance, a "Strategic Ability" bar graph could show Tywin Lannister towering over everyone else.

While a "Moral Compass" graph might see Jon Snow reaching for the sky.

Rating scales are great for quickly identifying strengths and weaknesses.

They also let you visualize the degree to which a leader excels or falters in a certain area.

Is Cersei slightly ruthless, or is she off the charts?

A rating scale can help you answer that question.

Taking It to the Next Level

Of course, you could always get really fancy.

Think interactive charts that let you filter by criteria or compare multiple leaders at once.

Or even network diagrams that show the relationships between different leaders and their impact on each other.

The possibilities are endless.

The point is, visual aids can take your "Game of Thrones" leadership analysis from good to great.

They’re a fun, engaging way to explore the complexities of Westerosi politics and make your arguments more compelling. So, grab your spreadsheets and start visualizing! Winter is coming, and you need to be prepared to analyze.

Final Ranking: The Leaders of Westeros, Ranked

Visual Aids: Level Up Your "Game of Thrones" Leadership Analysis
Okay, so we’ve dissected the big players, the ones sitting on the Iron Throne (or trying to). But let’s be real – no leader operates in a vacuum. Westeros is a tangled web of relationships, rivalries, and hidden agendas. To truly understand leadership in this world, we need to see how it all stacks up!

It’s time to unveil our carefully considered, definitely debatable, ranking of the leaders who shaped the fate of Westeros. Remember, this isn’t about who we liked best (though that might creep in a little!), but who demonstrated the most effective (and sometimes, effectively terrifying) leadership based on our previously defined criteria.

The Top Tier: Legends Forged in Fire and Ice

These are the leaders who left an undeniable mark on the world, whether through strategic brilliance, political maneuvering, or sheer force of will.

1: Daenerys Targaryen: The Breaker of Chains (and Sometimes, Cities)

Okay, let’s address the dragon in the room. Dany’s arc was…controversial. But her early leadership in Essos? Unquestionably transformative.

She freed slaves, built an army, and commanded the loyalty of diverse groups. Her strategic blunders in Westeros (cough, King’s Landing, cough) definitely dinged her, but her potential for greatness was undeniable.

Ultimately, her vision, even if flawed, propelled her to the top.

2: Jon Snow: The Reluctant King

Jon didn’t want to lead. But his inherent sense of duty, his unwavering morality (even when it was strategically inconvenient), and his ability to inspire loyalty made him a natural.

He united the Wildlings and the Night’s Watch, convinced Daenerys to fight alongside him, and ultimately saved Westeros from the Night King.

His biggest flaw? Maybe being too honorable in a world that often rewards ruthlessness.

3: Tyrion Lannister: The Mastermind with a Heart

Let’s be honest, without Tyrion, Westeros would probably be a smoking crater. His wit, his strategic mind, and his surprisingly strong moral compass made him an invaluable advisor to (almost) every major player.

He saved King’s Landing from Stannis, advised Daenerys on her conquest, and even managed to (sort of) guide Bran the Broken.

His weakness? A slight tendency to trust the wrong people (family, am I right?).

The Solid Contenders: Great, But Not Quite Legendary

These leaders were effective, but ultimately hampered by flaws, circumstances, or just plain bad luck.

4: Robb Stark: The Young Wolf Who Howled Too Soon

Robb was a brilliant military commander. He won battle after battle against the Lannisters. His problem? He was too young, too impulsive, and too honorable for the game of thrones.

Marrying for love instead of strategic advantage proved to be his undoing. A tragic figure, but a strong leader nonetheless.

5: Cersei Lannister: The Queen of (Controlled) Chaos

Love her or hate her (and most people strongly feel one way or the other), Cersei was a master of political manipulation. She clawed her way to the top and held onto power with a ferocity that was both terrifying and impressive.

Her problem? She was too ruthless, too paranoid, and ultimately, too self-destructive.

The Wildcards: Potential Unrealized (Or Best Forgotten)

These leaders were either too inconsistent, too untested, or just plain… weird to accurately assess.

6: Stannis Baratheon: The Man Who Should Have Been King

Stannis had a legitimate claim, unwavering conviction, and a strong sense of duty. But he was also rigid, humorless, and easily manipulated by religious zealots.

His leadership potential was undeniable, but his flaws ultimately outweighed his strengths.

7: Euron Greyjoy: The Rock Star Pirate (With Questionable Tactics)

Euron was… a character. He was charismatic, ruthless, and utterly unpredictable. He seized power through violence and commanded a formidable fleet.

But his lack of long-term vision and his penchant for unnecessary cruelty made him a dangerous and ultimately unsustainable leader.

A Final Word (and an Invitation to Argue!)

So there you have it! Our ranking of the leaders of Westeros. Of course, leadership is subjective, and the game of thrones is always changing.

We’re eager to hear your thoughts! Who did we rank too high? Too low? Who did we miss entirely? Let the debate begin! Sound off in the comments below!

So, how did you do? Were you able to easily name five Game of Thrones leaders, or did you struggle to remember everyone who vied for the Iron Throne? No matter how well you did, hopefully, this little quiz brought back some memories of the power struggles and iconic characters that made the series so captivating. Let us know in the comments how many you got right, and maybe even try to name five game-changing moments from the show while you’re at it!